NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800 GT VS ATI RADEON HD 5670

  -  

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, đoạn clip outputs & ports, Compatibility, dimensions & requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - video clip Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.




Bạn đang xem: Nvidia geforce 8800 gt vs ati radeon hd 5670

ATI Radeon HD 5670
*
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
*
Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons lớn consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later3.6x more pipelines: 400 vs 112Around 85% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflopsA newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nmAround 64% lower typical nguồn consumption: 64 Watt vs 105 Watt2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHzAround 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 5083.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 282 vs 79
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 January 2010 vs 29 October 2007
Pipelines 400 vs 112
Floating-point performance 620.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design power nguồn (TDP) 64 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 782 vs 508
PassMark - G2D Mark 282 vs 79



Xem thêm: Tải Game Lái Máy Xúc, Tải Game Máy Cẩu Cho Ipad, Game Lái Máy Xúc

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 775 MHz2.2x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / sAround 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2113Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2113
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 2113
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 2113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark GPU 1
GPU 2

Name ATI Radeon HD 5670 NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 782 508
PassMark - G2D Mark 282 79
Geekbench - OpenCL 1471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 184.557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - video Composition (Frames/s) 12.626
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.325
GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2113 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2113 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0



Xem thêm: Thuật Ngữ Dịch Các Lá Bài Yugioh Sang Tieng Viet? Thuật Ngữ Dịch Bài

ATI Radeon HD 5670 NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla
Code name Redwood G92
Design ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series
Launch date 14 January 2010 29 October 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $119 $349
Place in performance rating 1294 1211
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 775 MHz
Core clock speed 775 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 620.0 gflops 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 400 112
Stream Processors 400
Texture fill rate 15.5 GTexel / s 33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design power (TDP) 64 Watt 105 Watt
Transistor count 627 million 754 million
CUDA cores 112
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs và ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual link DVIHDTV
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Maximum vga resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions & requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm 9" (22.9 cm)
Supplementary power nguồn connectors None 6-pin & 8-pin
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 11 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
Unified video Decoder (UVD)
3D Vision
CUDA
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) 128bit